<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Why Google Should Fear (or Buy) Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sem-group.net/search-engine-optimization-blog/5-reasons-why-google-should-fear-or-buy-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sem-group.net/search-engine-optimization-blog/5-reasons-why-google-should-fear-or-buy-twitter/</link>
	<description>Smart Internet Marketing That Works</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:56:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Schleber</title>
		<link>http://sem-group.net/search-engine-optimization-blog/5-reasons-why-google-should-fear-or-buy-twitter/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Schleber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-group.net/?p=94#comment-1157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an excellent post, and I just excerpted the &quot;librarian&quot; metaphor to my Posterous, and thereby on to all my Twitter peeps. 
 
BTW @Roger, Twitter having the IM/chat aspect mashed up with email/blog-like/commenting asynchronous features is exactly the reason for Twitters success. 
 
As the post mentions, the crowd-sourced aggregator/guide function that Twitter users are naturally/effortlessly fulfilling is exactly what other crowd-sourced &quot;search&quot; tools like Mahalo have failed to resoundingly deliver. 
 
Twitter is like a hive-mind with interesting social connection wormholes (TM). 
 
&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Alex Schleber&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://businessmindhacks.com/post/is-advertising-failing-on-the-internet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is Advertising Failing On The Internet?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent post, and I just excerpted the &quot;librarian&quot; metaphor to my Posterous, and thereby on to all my Twitter peeps.</p>
<p>BTW @Roger, Twitter having the IM/chat aspect mashed up with email/blog-like/commenting asynchronous features is exactly the reason for Twitters success.</p>
<p>As the post mentions, the crowd-sourced aggregator/guide function that Twitter users are naturally/effortlessly fulfilling is exactly what other crowd-sourced &quot;search&quot; tools like Mahalo have failed to resoundingly deliver.</p>
<p>Twitter is like a hive-mind with interesting social connection wormholes (TM). </p>
<p>&lt;abbr&gt;<em>Alex Schleber&rsquo;s last blog post..<a href="http://businessmindhacks.com/post/is-advertising-failing-on-the-internet" rel="nofollow">Is Advertising Failing On The Internet?</a>&lt;/abbr&gt;</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Sikes</title>
		<link>http://sem-group.net/search-engine-optimization-blog/5-reasons-why-google-should-fear-or-buy-twitter/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Sikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-group.net/?p=94#comment-1150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Twitter can&#039;t come up with a way to proactively keep spammers from gaming the system, it&#039;ll fall by the wayside when the next big thing happens.  Google will keep moving along, because they&#039;ve established themselves and have done a good job of keeping search results relevant. 
 
I like Twitter, but there&#039;s a long ways to go until it&#039;s truly something that Google should fear. 
 
Besides, Twitter is like a slightly modded version of old school chatrooms (remember when you posted your chat to a page, and it refreshed to show you the most recent chats?  Same thing, just hashtags and following replaces chatrooms.). 
 
Great post, by the way!  It&#039;s always interesting to view the different perspectives on this. 
 
&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Roger Sikes&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://rogersikes.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/southwest-airlines-rapping-attendant/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Southwest Airlines Rapping Attendant&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Twitter can&#039;t come up with a way to proactively keep spammers from gaming the system, it&#039;ll fall by the wayside when the next big thing happens.  Google will keep moving along, because they&#039;ve established themselves and have done a good job of keeping search results relevant.</p>
<p>I like Twitter, but there&#039;s a long ways to go until it&#039;s truly something that Google should fear.</p>
<p>Besides, Twitter is like a slightly modded version of old school chatrooms (remember when you posted your chat to a page, and it refreshed to show you the most recent chats?  Same thing, just hashtags and following replaces chatrooms.).</p>
<p>Great post, by the way!  It&#039;s always interesting to view the different perspectives on this. </p>
<p>&lt;abbr&gt;<em>Roger Sikes&rsquo;s last blog post..<a href="http://rogersikes.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/southwest-airlines-rapping-attendant/" rel="nofollow">Southwest Airlines Rapping Attendant</a>&lt;/abbr&gt;</em> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashif</title>
		<link>http://sem-group.net/search-engine-optimization-blog/5-reasons-why-google-should-fear-or-buy-twitter/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-group.net/?p=94#comment-1126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting thoughts but what I feel that twitter has still got a long way to go before it becomes a significant threat or even a buying option for Google. 
 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts but what I feel that twitter has still got a long way to go before it becomes a significant threat or even a buying option for Google. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Edell</title>
		<link>http://sem-group.net/search-engine-optimization-blog/5-reasons-why-google-should-fear-or-buy-twitter/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Edell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-group.net/?p=94#comment-1023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly right. Just think of the possibilities as low as a penny or even a 1/2 cent per tweet. 
 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right. Just think of the possibilities as low as a penny or even a 1/2 cent per tweet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Weber</title>
		<link>http://sem-group.net/search-engine-optimization-blog/5-reasons-why-google-should-fear-or-buy-twitter/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sem-group.net/?p=94#comment-1020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes indeed time will tell. :-) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed time will tell. <img src='http://sem-group.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
